pysec-2022-170
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2022-03-21 19:15
Modified
2022-03-29 18:37
Details

mitmproxy is an interactive, SSL/TLS-capable intercepting proxy. In mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below, a malicious client or server is able to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks through mitmproxy. This means that a malicious client/server could smuggle a request/response through mitmproxy as part of another request/response's HTTP message body. While mitmproxy would only see one request, the target server would see multiple requests. A smuggled request is still captured as part of another request's body, but it does not appear in the request list and does not go through the usual mitmproxy event hooks, where users may have implemented custom access control checks or input sanitization. Unless mitmproxy is used to protect an HTTP/1 service, no action is required. The vulnerability has been fixed in mitmproxy 8.0.0 and above. There are currently no known workarounds.

Impacted products
Name purl
mitmproxy pkg:pypi/mitmproxy



{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mitmproxy",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/mitmproxy"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "b06fb6d157087d526bd02e7aadbe37c56865c71b"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.10",
        "0.10.1",
        "0.11",
        "0.11.1",
        "0.11.2",
        "0.11.3",
        "0.12.0",
        "0.12.1",
        "0.13",
        "0.14.0",
        "0.15",
        "0.16",
        "0.17",
        "0.18.1",
        "0.18.2",
        "0.18.3",
        "0.8",
        "0.8.1",
        "0.9",
        "0.9.1",
        "0.9.2",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.0.1",
        "2.0.2",
        "3.0.0",
        "3.0.1",
        "3.0.2",
        "3.0.3",
        "3.0.4",
        "4.0.0",
        "4.0.1",
        "4.0.3",
        "4.0.4",
        "5.0.0",
        "5.0.1",
        "5.1.0",
        "5.1.1",
        "5.2",
        "5.3.0",
        "6.0.0",
        "6.0.1",
        "6.0.2",
        "7.0.0",
        "7.0.1",
        "7.0.2",
        "7.0.3",
        "7.0.4"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24766",
    "GHSA-gcx2-gvj7-pxv3"
  ],
  "details": "mitmproxy is an interactive, SSL/TLS-capable intercepting proxy. In mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below, a malicious client or server is able to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks through mitmproxy. This means that a malicious client/server could smuggle a request/response through mitmproxy as part of another request/response\u0027s HTTP message body. While mitmproxy would only see one request, the target server would see multiple requests. A smuggled request is still captured as part of another request\u0027s body, but it does not appear in the request list and does not go through the usual mitmproxy event hooks, where users may have implemented custom access control checks or input sanitization. Unless mitmproxy is used to protect an HTTP/1 service, no action is required. The vulnerability has been fixed in mitmproxy 8.0.0 and above. There are currently no known workarounds.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2022-170",
  "modified": "2022-03-29T18:37:43.309818Z",
  "published": "2022-03-21T19:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://mitmproxy.org/posts/releases/mitmproxy8/"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/security/advisories/GHSA-gcx2-gvj7-pxv3"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/commit/b06fb6d157087d526bd02e7aadbe37c56865c71b"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…