pysec-2023-18
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2023-04-05 02:15
Modified
2023-05-04 03:49
Details

In LangChain through 0.0.131, the LLMMathChain chain allows prompt injection attacks that can execute arbitrary code via the Python exec method.

Impacted products
Name purl
langchain pkg:pypi/langchain
Aliases



{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "langchain",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/langchain"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.132"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1",
        "0.0.10",
        "0.0.100",
        "0.0.101",
        "0.0.101rc0",
        "0.0.102",
        "0.0.102rc0",
        "0.0.103",
        "0.0.104",
        "0.0.105",
        "0.0.106",
        "0.0.107",
        "0.0.108",
        "0.0.109",
        "0.0.11",
        "0.0.110",
        "0.0.111",
        "0.0.112",
        "0.0.113",
        "0.0.114",
        "0.0.115",
        "0.0.116",
        "0.0.117",
        "0.0.118",
        "0.0.119",
        "0.0.12",
        "0.0.120",
        "0.0.121",
        "0.0.122",
        "0.0.123",
        "0.0.124",
        "0.0.125",
        "0.0.126",
        "0.0.127",
        "0.0.128",
        "0.0.129",
        "0.0.13",
        "0.0.130",
        "0.0.131",
        "0.0.14",
        "0.0.15",
        "0.0.16",
        "0.0.17",
        "0.0.18",
        "0.0.19",
        "0.0.2",
        "0.0.20",
        "0.0.21",
        "0.0.22",
        "0.0.23",
        "0.0.24",
        "0.0.25",
        "0.0.26",
        "0.0.27",
        "0.0.28",
        "0.0.29",
        "0.0.3",
        "0.0.30",
        "0.0.31",
        "0.0.32",
        "0.0.33",
        "0.0.34",
        "0.0.35",
        "0.0.36",
        "0.0.37",
        "0.0.38",
        "0.0.39",
        "0.0.4",
        "0.0.40",
        "0.0.41",
        "0.0.42",
        "0.0.43",
        "0.0.44",
        "0.0.45",
        "0.0.46",
        "0.0.47",
        "0.0.48",
        "0.0.49",
        "0.0.5",
        "0.0.50",
        "0.0.51",
        "0.0.52",
        "0.0.53",
        "0.0.54",
        "0.0.55",
        "0.0.56",
        "0.0.57",
        "0.0.58",
        "0.0.59",
        "0.0.6",
        "0.0.60",
        "0.0.61",
        "0.0.63",
        "0.0.64",
        "0.0.65",
        "0.0.66",
        "0.0.67",
        "0.0.68",
        "0.0.69",
        "0.0.7",
        "0.0.70",
        "0.0.71",
        "0.0.72",
        "0.0.73",
        "0.0.74",
        "0.0.75",
        "0.0.76",
        "0.0.77",
        "0.0.78",
        "0.0.79",
        "0.0.8",
        "0.0.80",
        "0.0.81",
        "0.0.82",
        "0.0.83",
        "0.0.84",
        "0.0.85",
        "0.0.86",
        "0.0.87",
        "0.0.88",
        "0.0.89",
        "0.0.9",
        "0.0.90",
        "0.0.91",
        "0.0.92",
        "0.0.93",
        "0.0.94",
        "0.0.95",
        "0.0.96",
        "0.0.97",
        "0.0.98",
        "0.0.99",
        "0.0.99rc0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-29374"
  ],
  "details": "In LangChain through 0.0.131, the LLMMathChain chain allows prompt injection attacks that can execute arbitrary code via the Python exec method.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2023-18",
  "modified": "2023-05-04T03:49:46.000016Z",
  "published": "2023-04-05T02:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://twitter.com/rharang/status/1641899743608463365/photo/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/1119"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/814"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/1026"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…