CVE-2024-28250 (GCVE-0-2024-28250)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-03-18 21:42
Modified
2024-08-02 00:48
CWE
  • CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cilium cilium Version: >= 1.14.0, < 1.14.8
Version: >= 1.15.0, < 1.15.2
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-28250",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-03-19T14:36:42.524251Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T18:03:15.198Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.605Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "cilium",
          "vendor": "cilium",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.8"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-311",
              "description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-28250",
    "datePublished": "2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-03-07T14:33:30.036Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.605Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-28250\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-03-18T22:15:08.750\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-09T16:47:40.047\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versi\u00f3n 1.14.0 y anteriores a las versiones 1.14.8 y 1.15.2, en los cl\u00fasteres de Cilium con WireGuard habilitado y el tr\u00e1fico que coincide con las pol\u00edticas de Capa 7, el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy Envoy de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. y el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy DNS de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. Este problema se resolvi\u00f3 en Cilium 1.14.8 y 1.15.2 en modo de enrutamiento nativo (`routingMode=native`) y en Cilium 1.14.4 en modo de t\u00fanel (`routingMode=tunnel`). No es que en modo t\u00fanel, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` deba establecerse en `true`. No se conoce ning\u00fan workaround para este problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":4.0},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":4.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-311\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-319\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.14.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.14.8\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"50C01BB2-3804-450F-846D-DE7A23112DF6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.15.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.15.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9938037D-85A4-4964-B593-33015AEFC8DB\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-311\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 6.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"cilium\", \"product\": \"cilium\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.8\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.2\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-28250\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-03-19T14:36:42.524251Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-05-23T19:01:18.634Z\"}, \"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\"}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-28250\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-03-07T14:33:30.036Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-06-04T18:03:15.198Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…