fkie_cve-2024-28250
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-03-18 22:15
Modified
2025-01-09 16:47
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13Release Notes
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8Release Notes
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2Release Notes
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13Release Notes
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8Release Notes
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2Release Notes
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cilium cilium *
cilium cilium *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "50C01BB2-3804-450F-846D-DE7A23112DF6",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.14.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.14.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9938037D-85A4-4964-B593-33015AEFC8DB",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.15.2",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.15.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versi\u00f3n 1.14.0 y anteriores a las versiones 1.14.8 y 1.15.2, en los cl\u00fasteres de Cilium con WireGuard habilitado y el tr\u00e1fico que coincide con las pol\u00edticas de Capa 7, el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy Envoy de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. y el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy DNS de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. Este problema se resolvi\u00f3 en Cilium 1.14.8 y 1.15.2 en modo de enrutamiento nativo (`routingMode=native`) y en Cilium 1.14.4 en modo de t\u00fanel (`routingMode=tunnel`). No es que en modo t\u00fanel, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` deba establecerse en `true`. No se conoce ning\u00fan workaround para este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-28250",
  "lastModified": "2025-01-09T16:47:40.047",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 4.0,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 4.0,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-03-18T22:15:08.750",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-311"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-319"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.