CVE-2024-48916 (GCVE-0-2024-48916)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-30 19:45
Modified
2025-07-30 19:54
CWE
  • CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Summary
Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has "none" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ceph ceph Version: <= 19.2.3
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-48916",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-30T19:54:31.667804Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:54:42.022Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "ceph",
          "vendor": "ceph",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 19.2.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has \"none\" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Ceph is vulnerable to authentication bypass through RadosGW"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-48916",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-10-09T22:06:46.172Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:54:42.022Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-48916\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-07-30T20:15:33.423\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-07-31T18:42:37.870\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has \\\"none\\\" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Ceph es una plataforma distribuida de almacenamiento de objetos, bloques y archivos. En las versiones 19.2.3 y anteriores, es posible enviar un JWT con \\\"none\\\" como algoritmo JWT. Al hacerlo, no se verifica la firma JWT. Es probable que la vulnerabilidad se encuentre en el proveedor OIDC de RadosGW. Al momento de la publicaci\u00f3n, a\u00fan no se ha publicado una versi\u00f3n parcheada conocida.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Ceph is vulnerable to authentication bypass through RadosGW\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-345\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"ceph\", \"product\": \"ceph\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003c= 19.2.3\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has \\\"none\\\" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-48916\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-30T19:54:31.667804Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T19:54:34.502Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-48916\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-10-09T22:06:46.172Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T19:54:42.022Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…