fkie_cve-2012-6088
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2013-01-18 11:48
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an "unparseable signature," which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E3980237-762C-40CE-B376-EA225C2F9214",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "851F5ACE-A9AB-42BE-A36C-E9C4E333D293",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La funci\u00f3n rpmpkgRead en lib/package.c en RPM v4.10.x antes de v4.10.2 no devuelve un c\u00f3digo de error en determinadas situaciones relacionadas con una \"firma no analizable\", lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar los controles de firmas a trav\u00e9s de un paquete RPM dise\u00f1ado para tal fin."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-6088",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2013-01-18T11:48:41.057",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-255"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…