CVE-2012-6088 (GCVE-0-2012-6088)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2013-01-18 11:00
Modified
2024-08-06 21:21
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an "unparseable signature," which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:21:28.541Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375" }, { "name": "57138", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138" }, { "name": "51706", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20130103 Re: CVE Request -- rpm (X \u003e= 4.10 and X \u003c 3d74c43 commit): Signature checking function returned success on (possibly malicious ) rpm packages", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43" }, { "name": "USN-1694-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1" }, { "name": "rpm-security-bypass(80953)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_XF", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2012-12-07T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2017-08-28T12:57:01", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375" }, { "name": "57138", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138" }, { "name": "51706", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20130103 Re: CVE Request -- rpm (X \u003e= 4.10 and X \u003c 3d74c43 commit): Signature checking function returned success on (possibly malicious ) rpm packages", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43" }, { "name": "USN-1694-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU" ], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1" }, { "name": "rpm-security-bypass(80953)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_XF" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2012-6088", "datePublished": "2013-01-18T11:00:00", "dateReserved": "2012-12-06T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:21:28.541Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-6088\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2013-01-18T11:48:41.057\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \\\"unparseable signature,\\\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La funci\u00f3n rpmpkgRead en lib/package.c en RPM v4.10.x antes de v4.10.2 no devuelve un c\u00f3digo de error en determinadas situaciones relacionadas con una \\\"firma no analizable\\\", lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar los controles de firmas a trav\u00e9s de un paquete RPM dise\u00f1ado para tal fin.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-255\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E3980237-762C-40CE-B376-EA225C2F9214\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"851F5ACE-A9AB-42BE-A36C-E9C4E333D293\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/51706\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/51706\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…