fkie_cve-2025-6035
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-13 16:15
Modified
2025-08-21 20:15
Severity ?
6.6 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
A flaw was found in GIMP. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the GIMP "Despeckle" plug-in. The issue occurs due to unchecked multiplication of image dimensions, such as width, height, and bytes-per-pixel (img_bpp), which can result in allocating insufficient memory and subsequently performing out-of-bounds writes. This issue could lead to heap corruption, a potential denial of service (DoS), or arbitrary code execution in certain scenarios.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6035Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372515Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
gimp gimp 2.8.0
redhat enterprise_linux 6.0
redhat enterprise_linux 7.0
redhat enterprise_linux 8.0
redhat enterprise_linux 9.0


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gimp:gimp:2.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7B79E763-131B-43E2-B319-1A719C509301",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2F6AB192-9D7D-4A9A-8995-E53A9DE9EAFC",
              "vulnerable": false
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "142AD0DD-4CF3-4D74-9442-459CE3347E3A",
              "vulnerable": false
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F4CFF558-3C47-480D-A2F0-BABF26042943",
              "vulnerable": false
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7F6FB57C-2BC7-487C-96DD-132683AEB35D",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in GIMP. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the GIMP \"Despeckle\"  plug-in. The issue occurs due to unchecked multiplication of image dimensions, such as width, height, and bytes-per-pixel (img_bpp), which can result in allocating insufficient memory and subsequently performing out-of-bounds writes. This issue could lead to heap corruption, a potential denial of service (DoS), or arbitrary code execution in certain scenarios."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en GIMP. Existe una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de enteros en el complemento \"Despeckle\" de GIMP. El problema se produce debido a la multiplicaci\u00f3n sin control de las dimensiones de la imagen, como el ancho, el alto y los bytes por p\u00edxel (img_bpp), lo que puede provocar una asignaci\u00f3n de memoria insuficiente y, posteriormente, escrituras fuera de los l\u00edmites. Este problema podr\u00eda provocar corrupci\u00f3n del mont\u00f3n, una posible denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) o la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo arbitrario en ciertos escenarios."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-6035",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-21T20:15:48.673",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.6,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-06-13T16:15:28.067",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6035"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372515"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-190"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-190"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.