fkie_cve-2025-8283
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-28 19:15
Modified
2025-08-11 19:03
Severity ?
3.7 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
3.7 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
A vulnerability was found in the netavark package, a network stack for containers used with Podman. Due to dns.podman search domain being removed, netavark may return external servers if a valid A/AAAA record is sent as a response. When creating a container with a given name, this name will be used as the hostname for the container itself, as the podman's search domain is not added anymore the container is using the host's resolv.conf, and the DNS resolver will try to look into the search domains contained on it. If one of the domains contain a name with the same hostname as the running container, the connection will forward to unexpected external servers.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8283Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2383941Issue Tracking
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat openshift_container_platform 4.0
redhat enterprise_linux 8.0
redhat enterprise_linux 9.0
redhat enterprise_linux 10.0


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "932D137F-528B-4526-9A89-CD59FA1AB0FE",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F4CFF558-3C47-480D-A2F0-BABF26042943",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7F6FB57C-2BC7-487C-96DD-132683AEB35D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D65C2163-CFC2-4ABB-8F4E-CB09CEBD006C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability was found in the netavark package, a network stack for containers used with Podman. Due to dns.podman search domain being removed, netavark may return external servers if a valid A/AAAA record is sent as a response. When creating a container with a given name, this name will be used as the hostname for the container itself, as the podman\u0027s search domain is not added anymore the container is using the host\u0027s resolv.conf, and the DNS resolver will try to look into the search domains contained on it. If one of the domains contain a name with the same hostname as the running container, the connection will forward to unexpected external servers."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una vulnerabilidad en el paquete netavark, una pila de red para contenedores utilizados con Podman. Debido a la eliminaci\u00f3n del dominio de b\u00fasqueda dns.podman, netavark podr\u00eda devolver servidores externos si se env\u00eda un registro A/AAAA v\u00e1lido como respuesta. Al crear un contenedor con un nombre determinado, este se usar\u00e1 como nombre de host del contenedor. Dado que el dominio de b\u00fasqueda de Podman ya no se agrega, el contenedor utiliza el archivo resolv.conf del host y el solucionador DNS intentar\u00e1 buscar en los dominios de b\u00fasqueda que contiene. Si uno de los dominios contiene el mismo nombre de host que el contenedor en ejecuci\u00f3n, la conexi\u00f3n se redireccionar\u00e1 a servidores externos inesperados."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-8283",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-11T19:03:36.417",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-28T19:15:43.957",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8283"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2383941"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-15"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.