ghsa-6g33-f262-xjp4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-10-09 00:57
Modified
2023-09-08 20:56
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Cryptographically Weak PRNG in randomatic
Details
Affected versions of randomatic
generate random values using a cryptographically weak psuedo-random number generator. This may result in predictable values instead of random values as intended.
Recommendation
Update to version 3.0.0 or later.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "randomatic" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.0.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-16028" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-330", "CWE-338" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:19:13Z", "nvd_published_at": null, "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Affected versions of `randomatic` generate random values using a cryptographically weak psuedo-random number generator. This may result in predictable values instead of random values as intended.\n\n\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpdate to version 3.0.0 or later.", "id": "GHSA-6g33-f262-xjp4", "modified": "2023-09-08T20:56:26Z", "published": "2018-10-09T00:57:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16028" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/jonschlinkert/randomatic/commit/4a526959b3a246ae8e4a82f9c182180907227fe1#diff-b9cfc7f2cdf78a7f4b91a753d10865a2" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6g33-f262-xjp4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/tableflip/react-native-meteor-oauth/blob/a7eb738b74c469f5db20296b44b7cae4e2337435/src/meteor-oauth.js#L66" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/157" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Cryptographically Weak PRNG in randomatic" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…