ghsa-hfj4-96f7-6r5g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-11-09 17:49
Modified
2023-09-12 21:02
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting in html-janitor
Details
Versions of html-janitor
prior to 2.0.2 (all current versions) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS).
This is exploitable if user-controlled data is passed into the modules clean()
function.
Recommendation
No fix is currently available for this vulnerability. It is recommended to use an alternative module for HTML sanitization.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "html-janitor" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.0.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-0931" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:39:59Z", "nvd_published_at": null, "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Versions of `html-janitor` prior to 2.0.2 (all current versions) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS).\n\nThis is exploitable if user-controlled data is passed into the modules `clean()` function.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nNo fix is currently available for this vulnerability. It is recommended to use an alternative module for HTML sanitization.", "id": "GHSA-hfj4-96f7-6r5g", "modified": "2023-09-12T21:02:01Z", "published": "2018-11-09T17:49:11Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0931" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/guardian/html-janitor/issues/34" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/308155" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hfj4-96f7-6r5g" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/576" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Cross-Site Scripting in html-janitor" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…