gsd-2012-6088
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an "unparseable signature," which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2012-6088", "description": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.", "id": "GSD-2012-6088", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-6088.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-6088" ], "details": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package.", "id": "GSD-2012-6088", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:17.158444Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-6088", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "=", "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43" }, { "name": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2" }, { "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706" }, { "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138" }, { "name": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375" }, { "name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:4.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-6088" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The rpmpkgRead function in lib/package.c in RPM 4.10.x before 4.10.2 does not return an error code in certain situations involving an \"unparseable signature,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass RPM signature checks via a crafted package." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-255" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.2" }, { "name": "51706", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51706" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796375" }, { "name": "57138", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57138" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20130103 Re: CVE Request -- rpm (X \u003e= 4.10 and X \u003c 3d74c43 commit): Signature checking function returned success on (possibly malicious ) rpm packages", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/03/9" }, { "name": "USN-1694-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1694-1" }, { "name": "rpm-security-bypass(80953)", "refsource": "XF", "tags": [], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80953" }, { "name": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3d74c43" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": true } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2023-02-13T04:37Z", "publishedDate": "2013-01-18T11:48Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…