CVE-2015-20112 (GCVE-0-2015-20112)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-06-29 00:00
Modified
2025-06-30 15:44
Severity ?
3.4 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Summary
RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Ethereum RLPx Version: 5   <
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2015-20112",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-06-30T15:44:27.767688Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-06-30T15:44:44.955Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "RLPx",
          "vendor": "Ethereum",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.4,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-325",
              "description": "CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-06-29T20:31:02.205Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/issues/7926"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1315"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/rlpx.md#known-issues-in-the-current-version"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/LaurentMT/go-ethereum/commit/e8cba7283b57280b1bcf5761478f852398365901"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/32"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-20112",
    "datePublished": "2025-06-29T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-06-29T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-06-30T15:44:44.955Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-20112\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2025-06-29T21:15:22.210\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-06-30T18:38:23.493\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"RLPx 5 cuenta con dos flujos CTR basados en la misma clave, IV y nonce. Esto facilita el descifrado en una red privada.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-325\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/LaurentMT/go-ethereum/commit/e8cba7283b57280b1bcf5761478f852398365901\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/rlpx.md#known-issues-in-the-current-version\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/32\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1315\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/issues/7926\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2015-20112\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-06-30T15:44:27.767688Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-30T15:44:35.662Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 3.4, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Ethereum\", \"product\": \"RLPx\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/issues/7926\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1315\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/rlpx.md#known-issues-in-the-current-version\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/LaurentMT/go-ethereum/commit/e8cba7283b57280b1bcf5761478f852398365901\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/32\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"enrichogram 0.0.1\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-325\", \"description\": \"CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-29T20:31:02.205Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2015-20112\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-30T15:44:44.955Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-06-29T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-06-29T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.