fkie_cve-2015-20112
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-29 21:15
Modified
2025-06-30 18:38
Severity ?
Summary
RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "RLPx 5 cuenta con dos flujos CTR basados en la misma clave, IV y nonce. Esto facilita el descifrado en una red privada." } ], "id": "CVE-2015-20112", "lastModified": "2025-06-30T18:38:23.493", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 3.4, "baseSeverity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "CHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.6, "impactScore": 1.4, "source": "cve@mitre.org", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-06-29T21:15:22.210", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/LaurentMT/go-ethereum/commit/e8cba7283b57280b1bcf5761478f852398365901" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/rlpx.md#known-issues-in-the-current-version" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/32" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1315" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/issues/7926" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-325" } ], "source": "cve@mitre.org", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…